Friday, July 1, 2011

Three charged for internet crimes against children

Unfortunately here is the news about abuse of children on the internet:

 St. Charles (KMOV) – Several online investigations conducted by St. Charles County Cyber crime unit led to the arrest of three men on June 23, 2011.
The three men have been charged in St. Charles County for various internet crimes which were committed when they thought they were talking to children.
Rick D. Harrelson, 51, of Cottage Hills, IL. has been charged with four counts of Sexual Misconduct Involving A Child.
Andrew M. Roenfeldt, 23, of Phoenix, AZ. has been charged with two counts of Enticement Of A Child and one count of Attempted Use Of A Child In A Sexual Performance.
Kevin R. Vonarx, 23, of St. Louis, MO. has been charged with one count of Sexual Misconduct and one count of Attempted Use Of A Child in A Sexual Performance.
The charges set forth are merely accusations, and each defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.
<<http://www.kmov.com/news/local/Three-charged-for-internet-crimes-against-children-124715874.html>>

Monday, June 27, 2011

Who are the Internet bad guys? Really ?


Interesting viewing for me recently was watching YouTube videos about a security guard who was busted last week for hacking into the computer systems of the Dallas hospital where he was employed.
As smart as he may have been with computers, he was no mental giant at getting away with his crimes; he was busted after bragging about his exploits to fellow criminals and then posting videos of himself performing his crimes on the YouTube video website.
Fortunately, this Bozo was caught before anyone at the hospital was hurt. He was remotely controlling the hospitals heating and ventilation systems over the Internet, including those of operating rooms and pharmaceutical storage areas. Lives were at risk. It’s good that he was caught.
Why would anyone want to do what this creep did? Customers ask me similar questions all of the time. Why do bad-guy hackers write computer viruses? Why do they break into computer systems and mess around with other people’s property? What is wrong with these boneheads and how can I protect myself against them?
In an effort to help “normal” people understand how and why malicious hackers do what they do, security technology company McAfee has produced a very well-made film series titled, “H*Commerce: The Business of Hacking You.” The “H” stands for “hacking.” I recommend that anyone that uses a computer and the Internet watch this series. It is interesting, entertaining, informative, and does not require a technically-oriented mind to understand.
“Once seen as a hobby for basement-dwellers and computer geeks, hacking has evolved into a full-fledged industry that preys on people’s livelihoods, turning their information into billions in profit,” reads promotional material for the film. “What once was merely a nuisance, is now actively trying to steal your personal information, severely damage your credit, or empty out your bank account.”
The series begins by telling the story of Janella Spears, who lost more than $440,000 as the result of an email scam. The film explores the effects this cybercrime had on Janella and her family as well as Janella’s education in how to clean her system, handle hackers and stop cybercrime scams.
“The days when hackers were a small group of thrill-seekers breaking into computers to gain fame and notoriety are behind us,” says David Milam, chief marketing officer at McAfee. “Now, hacking for profit, or what we call H*Commerce, is a global industry in which Americans have lost a total of almost $8.5 billion dollars due to Internet scams and crimes in the last two years alone. Consumers must be aware of risks online, and we think that revealing real stories from victims will resonate with them.”
In addition to real-life victims of Internet scams, the series features industry heavyweights such as Jeff Moss, founder of the Defcon security conference and Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple Computer. Check the film out for free at www.stophcommerce.com.
Taken: <<http://normantranscript.com/headlines/x1521799433/Who-are-the-Internet-bad-guys>>

Saturday, June 25, 2011

Malaysia's Government Websites Were Hacked by Unknown Hackers Named as Anonymous

Now this time in malaysia and turkey. this group known as anonymous hackers hacked 198 governmental websites and now they are attempt to hack the prim minister of malaysia Dato' Najib Razak.
This hacking caused a lot of difficulty during this week for the people for connecting to the internet.
The minister of culture of malaysia warning the government about their attack to the Dato' Najjib Website and suggest them to preper their self to defend his website.
Taken from http://iranmalezi.com/123NewsDetail.aspx?NewsId=21132.

Friday, June 24, 2011

COLUMN: LulzSec Internet hacking is not harmless fun

In my cyberlaw subject one of the most epidemic crime is hacking. most of the hackers in these days are very young. here is study about hackers:

The British government, the Brazilian government, multinational corporations, U.S. defense contractors and the CIA — that’s one ambitious target list.
But whose? The Russians, the Chinese, the (gasp) terrorists? Who do we send James Bond after?
Turns out it’s a 19 year-old, among others.
On May 21, Ryan Cleary was arrested in alleged connection to recent hacker attacks by a group known as “LulzSec.” Cleary, a former member of another “hacktivist” group, was picked up in an operation conducted by Scotland Yard and the FBI, BBC reported.
But what is LulzSec, and why does it matter? Their website, lulzsecurity.com, describes them as “a small team of lulzy individuals who feel the drabness of the cyber community is a burden on what matters: fun.” That’s what “lulz,” a variant on LOL, means: It is an expression of general amusement.
Lulzsecurity.com oozes self-absorbed amusement. The text contains mocking references to Rebecca Black’s “Friday,” a truly horrible music video that took the Internet by storm, and an image of a longboat dubbed the “Lulz Boat” accompanied by the theme from “The Love Boat” cheerily playing in the background.
The group’s activities, however, go far past this general silliness. Earlier this year, Sony’s PlayStation Network, the online service for its PlayStation 3 game console, was offline for more than a month following a LulzSec-connected intrusion into their network. Millions of subscribers’ personal data was stolen, including credit-card information.
Their exploits also have included a (reportedly failed) hacking attempt on Lockheed-Martin, a U.S. defense contractor responsible for building the F-22 and F-35 fighter jets, among other things. The CIA’s public website suffered an outage, and PBS found itself with a defaced main page after they ran a documentary critical of Julian Assange, Wikileaks editor in chief. Other targets have included online game servers.
While I write this, the Brazilian government’s website is offline, with LulzSec’s Twitter feed claiming responsibility. Operations like this are mostly just an inconvenience, though I do not know what services Brazil offers through that website. More governmental and corporate websites are certain to suffer similar problems in the days ahead.
It is also certain that these organizations will attempt to fight back, as the above-mentioned arrest demonstrates. The members of LulzSec, whomever they may be, rely on the anonymity of the Internet and their own knowledge of how people are tracked across it. If and when they make a big enough mistake, or if the powers that be have better-skilled people in their employ, the group will eventually be found out and its members arrested, as was Ryan Cleary. It is important to note that LulzSec has denied his involvement in their operations, though it is unknown if that’s true. Regardless, this apparent failure on the part of law enforcement is fuel for ever more lulz.
And rightfully so. These illegal actions have no cause, no message behind them. Even if they did, it would be an inappropriate way of expressing discontent. This is the new face of modern vandalism and little more. What is amazing is the potential scope of the problem: millions of credit card numbers stolen. Multiply that by thousands of dollars worth of credit each, and you’re looking at the potential for billions of dollars’ worth of fraud.
Whether that data has yet been used maliciously is not known — credit card fraud is difficult to track. Regardless, the potential is there for information crimes of surprising magnitude.
LulzSec is a narcissistic bother, childishly lashing out at authority because it can. I hope it will be found out and disciplined before it grows into a sullen teen.
<<http://www.oudaily.com/news/2011/jun/23/column-lulzsec-internet-hacking-not-harmless-fun/>>

Thursday, June 23, 2011

MALAYSIAN JUDICIAL STRUCTURE

As we Live in malaysia we need to know how is the Judicial structure of Malaysia. In last Class of cyberlaw I learned about Jurisdiction. so it was interesting for me to see if something happened to me in malaysia how is the structure of judicial. Here is a Picture that you can under stand it. then ill explain what i've learned from http://www.kehakiman.gov.my website about this structure.


THE SUPERIOR COURTS
The Federal Court
The Apex Court
The Federal Court is the highest judicial authority in the country. It was established pursuant to Article 121(2) of the
Federal Constitution. Its decision binds all the courts below. Prior to 1st January 1985, the superior courts system in
Malaysia was three-tiered, namely,
The Privy Council
The Supreme Court
The High Court Malaya and the High Court Borneo.
The Privy Council was the highest court of appeal for Malaysia until 31st December 1984. On 1st January 1985, all appeals
from Malaysia to the Privy Council were abolished. In its place, the Supreme Court was established making it the
final court of appeal in the country. The abolishment of appeals to the Privy Council resulted in a change from the
three-tiered system of superior courts to a two-tiered system, which was the Supreme Court and the two (2) High Courts.
In 1994, a significant change took place in the Judiciaryw hen Parliament amended the Federal Constitution. With the amendment, the Court of Appeal was established. The Supreme Court was renamed the Federal Court. As a consequence, the three-tiered system of the superior courts was restored.
The Federal Court is headed by the Chief Justice. Prior to the amendment the post was known as the Lord President.
Members
According to Article 122(1) of the Federal Constitution, the Federal Court shall consist of the Chief Justice, the President of the Court of Appeal, the two Chief Judges of the two High Courts and seven other judges.
Appointment of Judges
Article 122B of the Federal Constitution provides for the appointment of the Chief Justice, the President of the Court of Appeal, the Chief Judges of the High Courts and the other judges of the Federal Court by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the Prime Minister, after consulting the Conference of Rulers. Before tendering his advice, the Prime Minister shall, except for the appointment of the Chief Justice, consult the Chief Justice.
Appointment of Additional Judges Article 122(1A) of the Federal Constitution, allows the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the Chief Justice, to appoint any person who has held high judicial office in Malaysia to be an additional judge of the Federal Court. This appointment may be for such purposes or for such period as may be determined by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.
Composition
Every proceeding in the Federal Court is according to section 74 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, heard and disposed off by three judges or such greater uneven number of judges as the Chief Justice may in any particular case determine. In the absence of the Chief Justice the most senior member of the Court shall preside.
Article 122(2) of the Federal Constitution provides that the Chief Justice, if he considers that the interests of justice so require, may nominate a judge of the Court of Appeal other than the President of the Court of Appeal to sit as a judge in the Federal Court.
Sittings
The Court sits on such dates and at such places as the Chief Justice may from time to time direct. Normally the Federal Court sits at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya. However the Federal Court also goes on circuit to the major towns of Penang, Ipoh, Kota Bharu, Johor Bahru, Alor Setar, Kuantan, Malacca, Kuching and Kota Kinabalu (section 75 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).
Jurisdiction
Article 121(2) of the Federal Constitution confers the Federal Court with the following jurisdiction–
(a) to determine appeals from decisions of the Court of Appeal, of the High Court or a judge thereof;
(b) such original or consultative jurisdiction as is specified in Articles 128 and 130; and
(c) such other jurisdiction as may be conferred by or under federal law.
Criminal Appeals
The Federal Court may subject to section 87 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 hears and determines appeals against decisions of the Court of Appeal relating to any criminal matter decided by the High Court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction.
Civil Appeals
Section 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 provides that an appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal may be made to the Federal Court with with the leave of the Federal Court. Leave is only granted if–
(a) the decision of the Court of Appeal is in respect of any civil cause or matter decided by the High Court
in exercise of its original jurisdiction where it involves a question of general principle of law decided for the
first time or a question of importance upon which further argument and a decision of the Federal Court would
be to public advantage; or
(b) the decision of the Court of Appeal is as to the effect of any provision of the Federal Constitution including
the validity of any written law relating to any such provision.
(section 96(a) and (b) Courts of Judicature Act 1964).
Original
The Federal Court has the exclusive jurisdiction to determine–
(a) any question whether a law made by Parliament or by the Legislature of a State is invalid on the ground
that it makes provision with respect to a matter with respect to which Parliament or, the Legislature of the
State has no power to make laws; and
(b) disputes on any other question between States or between the Federation and any State.
(Article 128(1) of the Federal Constitution).
Referral
The referral jurisdiction of the Federal Court is provided for in Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution which reads—
“Without prejudice to any appellate jurisdiction of the Federal Court, where in any proceedings before another court a question arises as to the effect of any provision of this Constitution, the Federal Court shall have jurisdiction (subject to any rules of court regulating the exercise of that jurisdiction) to determine the question and remit the case to the other court to be disposed of in accordance with the determination.”
Advisory
The advisory jurisdiction of the Federal Court is provided for in Article 130 of the Federal Constitution which reads—
“The Yang di-Pertuan Agong may refer to the Federal Court for its opinion any question as to the effect of any provision of this Constitution which has arisen or appears likely to arise, and the Federal Court shall pronounce in open court its opinion on any question so referred to it.”
THE SPECIAL COURT
Constitution
The Special Court was established pursuant to Article 182 of the Federal Constitution to hear any action civil or criminal instituted by or against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or any of the nine Malay Rulers.
However, by Article 183 of Federal Constitution no action, civil or criminal, shall be instituted against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or any of the Rulers of States in respect of anything done or omitted to be done by him in his personal capacity except with the consent of the Attorney General personally.
Members
Article 182(1) of the Federal Constitution provides that the Special Court shall consist of the Chief Justice of the Federal Court, who shall be the Chairman, the Chief Judges of the two High Courts and two other persons who hold or have held office as judges of the Federal Court or the High Court appointed by the Conference of Rulers.
Jurisdiction
Article 182(3) of the Federal Constitution stipulates that the Special Court has an exclusive jurisdiction to try all offences committed in the Federation by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or any of the Rulers of the States and all civil cases by or against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or any of the Rulers of the States notwithstanding where the cause of action arose.
In addition to its exclusive jurisdiction, the Special Court also has the same jurisdiction and powers as are vested in the subordinate courts, the High Court and the Federal Court by the Federal Constitution.
Proceedings
The procedure (including the hearing of proceedings in camera) in civil or criminal cases and the law regulating evidence and proof in civil and criminal proceedings, the practice and procedure applicable in any proceedings in any subordinate court, the High Court and the Federal Court shall apply in any proceedings before
the Special Court. The proceedings of the Special Court is decided by the opinion of the majority of the members.
Finality of decision
The decision of the Special Court is final and conclusive and
cannot be challenged or called into question in any court on any ground.
Sittings
The Special Court may sit at the premises of the Federal Court located at the Palace of Justice, Putrajaya Wilayah Persekutuan on such dates and at such times as the Chief Justice may from time to time appoint.
THE COURT OF APPEAL
The Court of Appeal was established in 1994. It has–
(a) the jurisdiction to determine appeals from decisions
of a High Court or a judge thereof; and
(b) such other jurisdiction as may be provided for under any federal law.
(Article 121(1B) of the Federal Constitution).
As from 1st January 2002 the number of judges was increased to fifteen by order of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (Article 122A(1) Federal Constitution).
Members
Article 122A(1) of the Federal Constitution provides that the Court of Appeal shall consist of the President of the Court of Appeal and fifteen Court of Appeal judges.
Appointment of Judges
Article 122B (2) and (4) of the Federal Constitution provides that the President
of the Court of Appeal and the Court of Appeal judges shall be appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong acting on the advice of the Prime Minister, after consulting the Conference of Rulers. Before tendering his advice the Prime Minister shall consult the Chief Justice and the President of Court of Appeal.
Composition
Proceedings in the Court of Appeal are heard and disposed of by a panel of three judges or such greater uneven number of judges as the President of the Court of Appeal may determine (section 38 Courts of Judicature Act 1964). In accordance with Article 122A(2) of the Federal Constitution a judge of a High Court may sit as a judge of the Court of Appeal where the President of the Court of Appeal considers that the interests of justice so require. The judge shall be nominated for the purpose by the President after consulting the Chief Judge of that High Court.
Sittings
The Court of Appeal sits at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya, Wilayah Persekutuan. However, the President may, when he deems expedient, direct that any appeal proceeding be heard at any time and in any place in Malaysia (section 39 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).

Final Court
The Court of Appeal is the final court of appeal on matters decided by the High Court in its appellate or revisionary jurisdiction (sections 87 and 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).
Jurisdiction
Criminal
The Court of Appeal has the jurisdiction to hear and determine any criminal appeal against any decision by the High Court—
(a) made in the exercise of its original jurisdiction; and
(b) in the exercise of its appellate or revisionary jurisdiction on any criminal matter decided by the Sessions Court.
However, if it is an appeal from a decision of the High Court exercising its appellate or revisionary jurisdiction on any criminal matter that originated from a Magistrates’ Court then no further appeal to the Court of Appeal is permissible without leave of the Court of Appeal and such appeal must be confined only to questions of law which may have arisen in the course of the appeal or revision and the determination of which by the High Court has affected the event of the appeal or revision (section 50(1) & (2) Courts of Judicature Act 1964).
Civil
The Court of Appeal has the jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from any judgment or order of any High Court in any civil cause or matter, whether made in the exercise of its original or of its appellate jurisdiction, subject to any written law regulating the terms and conditions upon which such appeals are brought (section 67 of the Courts of the Judicature Act 1964). However, no appeal shall be brought to the Court of Appeal in the following cases—
(a) if the amount or value of the subject matter of the claim is less than RM250,000/- except with the leave of the Court;
(b) the judgment or order is made by consent of parties;
(c) the judgment or order relates to costs only; and
(d) where by virtue of any written law the judgment or order of the High Court is final.
No appeal shall lie from a decision of a Judge in Chambers in a summary way on an interpleader summons, where the facts are not in dispute, except with leave of the Court (section 68 Courts of Judicature Act 1964).
Specialized Panels
As appeals to the Court of Appeal are on the upsurge each year, sittings of the Court have also been increased. In order to expedite the disposal of appeals specialized panels have been constituted. The panels are as follows–
• Criminal Panel
• Commercial Panel
• Civil Panel
• Interlocutory Panel
• Leave to Appeal Panel
• Prerogative Writs Panel
Registry
The principal registry of the Court of Appeal is located at the Palace of Justice, Putrajaya, Wilayah Persekutuan. It is headed by a Registrar and assisted by Deputy and Senior Assistant Registrars. Although all appeals from the High Courts are filed in the respective High Courts they are registered in the Court of Appeal Registry at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya.
THE HIGH COURTS
In Malaysia there are two High Courts having coordinate jurisdiction and status, that is the High Court in Malaya and the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak. The High Court in Malaya consists of a Chief Judge and forty-seven judges whilst High Court in Sabah and Sarawak consists of a Chief Judge and ten judges. (Articles 121(1) and 122AA(1) of the Federal Constitution).
Appointment of Judges
The judges are appointed under Article 122B (2) and (4) of the Federal Constitution by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the Prime Minister after consulting the Conference of Rulers. Before the Prime Minister tenders his advice to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, the Prime Minister shall consult the Chief Justice and the Chief Judge of that Court. A person is qualified for appointment as a judge of any High
Courts if he is a citizen and for the 10 years preceding his appointment he has been an advocate of those courts or has been a member of the judicial and legal service of the Federation or of the legal service of a State. The appointment of a judicial commissioner is provided for under Article 122AB of the Federal Constitution. A judicial commissioner who is appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the Prime Minister after consulting the Chief Justice shall have the same powers and enjoy the same immunities as if he had been a judge of the High Court.
Sittings
The High Courts sit at such times and at such places as the Chief Judges shall from time to time appoint (section 19 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).
Jurisdiction
Criminal
The High Court has jurisdiction to try all offences committed–
(a) within local jurisdiction;
(b) on the high seas on board any ship or on any aircraft registered in Malaysia;
(c) by any citizen or any permanent resident on the high seas on board any ship or on any aircraft;
(d) by any person on high seas where the offence is piracy
by the law of nations; and
(e) offences under Chapter VI of the Penal Code and those
offences of extra-territorial in nature.
(Section 22 of the Courts Judicature Act 1964).
The High Court may pass any sentence allowed by law (section 22(2) of the Courts of Judicature Act). Cases involving capital punishment are tried in the High Court. However, under special circumstances cases not involving capital punishment may
be heard in the High Court on the application by the Public Prosecutor (section 418A Criminal Procedure Code).
Civil
The High Court has jurisdiction to try all proceedings where –
(a) the cause of action arose;
(b) the defendant or one of several defendants resides or has his place of business;
(c) the facts on which the proceedings are based exist or are alleged to have occurred; or
(d) any land the ownership of which is disputed is situated,
within the local jurisdiction of the Court and notwithstanding anything contained in section 23 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, in any case where all parties consent in writing within the local jurisdiction of the other High Court.
The High Courts also have specific jurisdiction including–
(a) jurisdiction under any written law relating to divorce, matrimonial causes, bankruptcy or companies;
(b) the same jurisdiction and authority in relation to matters of admiralty as is had by the High Court of Justice in England under the United Kingdom Supreme Court Act
1981;
(c) jurisdiction to appoint and control guardians of infant and generally over the person and property of infants;
(d) jurisdiction to appoint and control guardians and keepers of the person and estates of idiots, mentally disordered persons and persons of unsound mind; and
(e) jurisdiction to grant probates of will and testaments and letters of administration of estates of deceased persons leaving property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court and to alter or revoke such grants.
(Section 24 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).
Appellate
The High Court has the power to hear appeals from the subordinate courts. However not all decisions of the subordinate courts are appealable to the High Court. No appeal shall lie to the High Court from a decision of a subordinate court in any civil cause or matter where the amount in dispute or the value of the subject matter is ten thousand ringgit or less except where it involves a question of law (sections 26-29 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).
Revisionary Power
The High Court may exercise powers of revision in respect of criminal proceedings and matters in the subordinate courts in accordance with any law for the time being in force relating to criminal procedure. The High Court may call for and examine the record of any civil proceedings before any subordinate court for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any decision recorded or passed, and as to the regularity of any proceedings of any such subordinate court (sections 31 and 32 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).
Specialization
The courts in Malaysia are heading towards specialization. This move is fuelled by the desire to provide the best service to the public, in the form of dispensing justice fairly, speedily and effectively. In the major towns where there are two or more High Court judges, specialization had already taken place.
Specialization in the Kuala Lumpur High Courts
In the High Court in Malaya at Kuala Lumpur, specialization is done by categorising the High Court into Criminal, Civil, Commercial, Appellate and Special Powers and Family Divisions.

(i) Criminal Division
The Criminal Division hears cases in the exercise of its original, appellate or revisionary jurisdiction on any criminal matter from the subordinate courts.
(ii) Civil Division
The Civil Division hears among others, actions on foreclosure, tort and contracts for services.
(iii) Commercial Division
The Commercial Division hears among others, admiralty, insurance, companies winding-up, agency, banking, intellectual property and Specific Relief Act cases. There is further specialization in the Commercial Division, in that, all Islamic Banking (Muamalat) cases are heard by a judge in this Division, who in addition, also hears other commercial cases.
(iv) The Appellate and Special Powers Division
The Appellate and Special Powers Division hears appeals from the subordinate courts, cases under the Legal Profession Act 1976 and judicial review of administrative actions and under specific Acts.
(v) Family Division
Formerly, the Family Court was part of the Civil Division. Now, it is a Division by itself and hearing matrimonial cases under the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976.
Deputy Registrars and Senior Assistant Registrars
High Court judges are assisted by Deputy Registrars and Senior Assistant Registrars who are appointed under section 10 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, on the recommendation of the Chief Justice. The Deputy Registrars and Senior Assistant Registrars hear interlocutory matters in Chambers, do research for the judges, and also perform administrative duties, such as overseeing
the running of their respective courts’ registries.
THE SUBORDINATE COURTS
Subordinate courts consist of the Sessions Court, the Magistrate’s Court and the Court for Children. A Sessions Court is presided by a Sessions Court judge while a Magistrate’s Court and a Court for Children are presided by magistrates.
Sessions Court
A Sessions Court has the jurisdiction to hear both criminal and civil cases. At present there are eighty seven Sessions Court judges throughout Malaysia.
Appointment
A Sessions Court judge is appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the recommendation of the respective Chief Judges
(section 59 of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948).
Sittings
The court sits everyday except on public holidays.
Jurisdiction
Criminal
A Sessions Court has the jurisdiction to try all offences other than offences punishable with death. Except for the sentence of death, a Sessions Court may pass any sentence including natural life sentence (sections 63 and 64 of the Subordinate
Courts Act 1948).
Magistrates' Court
The Magistrates’ Courts have jurisdiction to hear both criminal and civil cases. At present there are one hundred and fifty one Magistrates throughout Malaysia.
Appointment
For the Federal Territory, magistrates are appointed by Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the recommendation of the Chief Judge. In each of the States, magistrates are appointed by the State Authority on the recommendation of the respective Chief
Judges (section 78 of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948). Sittings The court sits everyday except on public holidays.
Jurisdiction
Criminal
A First Class Magistrate has jurisdiction to try all offences for which the maximum sentence does not exceed ten years imprisonment or with fine only (section 85 of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948).
Civil
A First Class Magistrate has the jurisdiction to hear all actions and suits of a civil nature where the amount in dispute or value of the subject matter does not exceed RM25,000.00 (section 90 of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948).
Court For Children
A Court for Children was established under the Child Act 2001. Section 2 of the Act defines “Child” as a person under the age of eighteen years, and for the purposes of criminal proceedings, means a person who has attained the age of ten.
Composition
The Court shall consist of a magistrate and shall, as the case may require, be assisted by two advisors (section 11(2) Child Act 2001).
Sittings
No person shall be present in any sitting of this court except among others members and officers of the court and the children who are parties to the case including their parents or guardians (section 12 of the Child Act 2001).
Sentence or Orders
If a child is found guilty of an offence, he shall not be imprisoned, but among others, may either be sent to an approved school or released on bail. For capital offences, the child shall be detained in prison at the pleasure of the Ruler (sections 91-97 of the Child Act 2001).

<< http://www.kehakiman.gov.my/courts/judicialEN.shtml#tfc >>